5CEBA2F23C8N vs 5CEBA5U19C7N

5CEBA2F23C8Nと5CEBA5U19C7Nの詳細な比較では、それぞれの仕様と主要機能に関する貴重な洞察を提供します。RoHS指令への準拠、REACH規則、シリーズ、実装スタイル、パッケージタイプ、その他の関連特性など、重要な要素を詳細に網羅しています。違いを並べて表示することで、部品選定が容易になり、特定のアプリケーションに最適なオプションを選択しやすくなります。

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Compatible functional replacement candidate

The 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N are both Intel Cyclone V FPGAs sharing the same core architecture and logic cell family, making them functionally related candidates. However, they differ in logic density, package footprint, and speed grade, so a direct drop-in replacement is not possible without design migration. The 5CEBA5U19C7N offers higher logic capacity and a faster speed grade in a smaller package, while the 5CEBA2F23C8N provides lower density in a larger FBGA package. Designers must validate pinout, thermal, and power delivery requirements before substituting.

Logic Density Validation required
Package Type Not compatible
Speed Grade Validation required
Core Architecture High match

Parts at a glance

Part A

5CEBA2F23C8N

インテル

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
2918 個数
Package
FBGA-484
Series
組み込み - FPGA(フィールド・プログラマブル・ゲート・アレイ)
Part B

5CEBA5U19C7N

インテル

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
6311 個数
Package
FBGA-484
Series
組み込み - FPGA(フィールド・プログラマブル・ゲート・アレイ)

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter 5CEBA2F23C8N 5CEBA5U19C7N Why it matters
Family / Series Cyclone V E Cyclone V E Same device family ensures similar architecture, toolchain support, and IP compatibility for substitution.
Logic Elements (LE) 25,000 49,000 Logic capacity determines whether a design fits; a smaller device cannot host logic that requires more elements.
Total Embedded Memory 1,536 Kbit 3,088 Kbit On-chip memory affects buffering, FIFO depth, and whether external memory can be avoided.
Number of 18x18 Multipliers 66 140 DSP block count limits parallel arithmetic throughput for filtering, FFT, and control algorithms.
Maximum User I/O 224 240 I/O count determines how many peripherals, buses, and interfaces can be connected simultaneously.
Package FBGA-484 UBGA-484 Package type and footprint must match the PCB land pattern for a drop-in replacement.
Speed Grade 8 7 Speed grade affects maximum operating frequency and timing closure; a faster grade can replace a slower one but not vice versa.
Operating Temperature Range 0°C to 85°C (Commercial) 0°C to 85°C (Commercial) Temperature grade must meet the target application's environmental requirements.
Core Supply Voltage 1.1 V 1.1 V Core voltage must match the board power design to avoid electrical damage or malfunction.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification 5CEBA2F23C8N 5CEBA5U19C7N
Supplier - Intel
Series Cyclone® V E Cyclone® V E
Part Status Active Active
Number of LABs/CLBs 9434 29080
Number of Logic Elements/Cells 25000 77000
Total RAM Bits 2002944 5001216
Number of I/O 224 224
Voltage - Supply 1.07V ~ 1.13V 1.07V ~ 1.13V
Mounting Type Surface Mount Surface Mount
Operating Temperature 0°C ~ 85°C (TJ) 0°C ~ 85°C (TJ)

Frequently asked questions

What are the 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N devices?

Both are Intel (formerly Altera) Cyclone V GX FPGA devices. The 5CEBA2F23C8N is a Cyclone V GX FPGA with 25,000 logic elements in a 484-pin FBGA package (23 mm x 23 mm) and speed grade 8. The 5CEBA5U19C7N is a Cyclone V GX FPGA with 77,000 logic elements in a 484-pin UBGA package (19 mm x 19 mm) and speed grade 7.

Are the 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N pin-to-pin compatible?

No. Although both devices use a 484-pin package, the 5CEBA2F23C8N uses a 23 mm x 23 mm FBGA (F23) while the 5CEBA5U19C7N uses a 19 mm x 19 mm UBGA (U19). The package footprints, ball maps, and PCB land patterns differ, so they are not drop-in replacements.

How do the logic densities of the 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N compare?

The 5CEBA2F23C8N provides 25,000 logic elements (LEs), while the 5CEBA5U19C7N provides 77,000 LEs. The 5CEBA5U19C7N offers approximately three times the logic capacity of the 5CEBA2F23C8N.

What is the difference in speed grade between the 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N?

The 5CEBA2F23C8N is rated at speed grade 8, and the 5CEBA5U19C7N is rated at speed grade 7. In Intel Cyclone V FPGA nomenclature, a lower speed grade number indicates a faster device, so the 5CEBA5U19C7N (grade 7) is the faster of the two.

Do the 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N have the same transceiver count and speed?

Both devices are Cyclone V GX variants and include transceiver channels, but the exact transceiver count and maximum data rate depend on the specific device density and package. The 5CEBA5U19C7N, with its higher logic density, generally supports more transceiver channels than the 5CEBA2F23C8N. Designers must verify the exact transceiver count and supported protocols in the respective device datasheets.

Can the 5CEBA2F23C8N be used as a substitute for the 5CEBA5U19C7N in an existing design?

No, not without a redesign. The two devices differ in logic density, package footprint, ball map, and speed grade. A direct substitution would require PCB layout changes, re-timing analysis, and revalidation of the design against the target device's resources and performance characteristics.

What are the typical applications for the 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N?

Both devices are used in industrial, automotive, and communication applications requiring FPGA flexibility. The 5CEBA2F23C8N is suited to lower-density control and interface tasks, while the 5CEBA5U19C7N supports more complex processing, higher logic utilization, and faster timing closure due to its larger logic capacity and faster speed grade.

Are the 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N lead-free and RoHS compliant?

Intel Cyclone V FPGA devices, including the 5CEBA2F23C8N and 5CEBA5U19C7N, are offered in lead-free package options and are RoHS compliant. Designers should confirm the specific ordering code and package suffix with the manufacturer's datasheet or product page to ensure compliance for their application.